2026-01-26 – Weekly Biology News : Late-night PCR humor thread

Last week’s discussions in the Biology community covered a wide range of fascinating topics. A blend of humor and technical challenges kept members engaged, from late-night PCR experiments to unexpected hurdles in phylogenetic studies. There was also a lively exchange on CRISPR technology, showcasing both its potential and its pitfalls. Environmental concerns made a significant appearance with discussions on pollutants affecting marine life.


This Week’s Hot Topics

PCR at 2 a.m. is a comedy
A thread that turns the stress of late-night lab work into a source of humor. It’s a relatable read for anyone who’s ever been in the lab past midnight.
Read more here

When convergence ruins your tree
This discussion dives into the complexities of phylogenetic trees and how convergent evolution can complicate your analyses. It’s a must-read for those in evolutionary biology.
Read more here

CRISPR’d yeast, accidentally edited my weekend
An amusing yet insightful look at how gene editing can lead to unexpected results, even in one’s personal life. Perfect for those interested in CRISPR’s broader implications.
Read more here

When cells ignore the Gantt chart
Here, members discuss the challenges of managing cell cultures that refuse to follow planned timelines, offering tips and shared experiences.
Read more here

Whales’ closest living relatives
A thread unraveling the intriguing evolutionary history of whales and their unexpected kin. It’s a captivating read for marine biology enthusiasts.
Read more here

6PPD-quinone in stormwater, coho dying fast
This urgent discussion highlights the impact of a chemical pollutant on salmon populations, sparking an important conversation on environmental stewardship.
Read more here


Thanks for being a part of our community. Looking forward to what next week will bring.

I stopped getting ‘phantom bands’ by making single-use primer aliquots and tossing them after a week; for GC-heavy templates, 3% DMSO has worked better than just cranking annealing temp — anyone else see that?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​⁠​​​⁠​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‍‌​⁠‍‌‌⁠​‌‌‍‍​‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠‍‌‌⁠​‌​⁠​‌‌​‍‌‌‍⁠‌‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠​⁠​⁠​​‌‌​‍‌‌​​‌‌‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

@lthompson Touchdown PCR rescued my GC-rich templates — starting about 8°C above Tm and stepping down 1°C per cycle, plus 1 M betaine, gave clean bands. If betaine sulks with your polymerase, 0.5× Q-solution or 5% trehalose has been gentler; my gels stopped looking like a Rorschach test.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​⁠​​​⁠​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌‌​⁠‌‌​‌‍‌‍‌​‌‌​​​⁠​‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌‍‍⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌‍‍⁠‌⁠​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

When late-night PCR started giving me ‘ghost’ bands, switching to a dUTP/UNG setup nuked carryover — 37°C for 10 min then 95°C to inactivate — cleaned it right up. Caveat: some cloning steps hate dUTP, so I re-amplify the final insert with normal dNTPs; @mindy_r76, might be worth a shot?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​⁠​​​⁠​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​⁠​⁠‌‌​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‌​​​⁠​‌‌‌‌‍‌​‌⁠‌⁠‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌​‌⁠‌‌‌​‌⁠‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌