What You’ll Do:
Serve as a Biology Expert in an AI training role—designing and reviewing biology-focused content, annotating datasets, and providing expert insights to improve AI accuracy. Responsibilities include explaining complex biological processes, verifying content clarity, and collaborating with cross-functional teams to refine model training data.
Why It Stands Out:
Top-tier pay range ($50–$80/hour), which is exceptional for remote, part-time biology roles
Fully remote—you can work from anywhere in the U.S., providing flexibility and autonomy
High-impact niche—shape the scientific accuracy of AI models with your biology expertise
Potential Trade-offs:
Contract-based—no long-term stability or benefits guaranteed
Requires advanced biology knowledge and likely experience in content evaluation or teaching
Part-time hours (15–40 per week)—may not suit those seeking full-time commitment
This role is ideal if you’re passionate about biology and want a flexible, high-impact gig teaching AI systems with your scientific expertise.
Would you take this job? Does the pay, flexibility, and scientific depth make this compelling for you—or would the contract nature or part-time hours be a deal-breaker? How do you feel about AI?
I’d consider it as a side gig if they guarantee at least 10–15 hrs/week and the scope is actual expert review, not endless labeling. $50–$80/hr is fine for content QA, borderline if they expect prompt engineering + eval + SME depth. Did they say anything about IP rights or a non-compete?
I’d consider it at $60–$70 if it’s mostly annotation/prompt eval, but that’s low if they want full lesson or curriculum writing and meetings. Anyone here worked with micro1 — what were the actual tasks and did they pay on time?
Haven’t worked with micro1, but in a similar AI bio trainer contract I got $70/hr with about 60% annotation and 40% expert review. Tip: ask for a paid pilot week and make meeting time, revision rounds, and a minimum weekly hours clause explicit in the SOW.